2. The object has one index, and thus the order is 1
3. In , both and can take two different values (1 or 2). Hence, the dimension of is still 2. However, there are now two indices, and the order of is 2.
In the following expressions, which indices are dummy and which are free?
Given that and , express using , , and
Using , calculate
1.1. is not repeated in the same term and is a free index, is repeated and is dummy
1.2. and are not repeated in the same term and are free, and are repeated and are thus dummies
1.3. is not repeated in the same term (even if it is repeated in different terms) and is therefore a free index 1.4. and exist only once in each term: free indices. and are repeated twice in each term: dummies
2. If , we have equivalently , hence
3. The expression already includes the indices and , we must therefore change those indices in the first expression before multiplying: is equivalent as in this expression and where dummy indices and we can therefore change them to any available indices, in this case and . We then have .
1. Here we want to sum over and from 1 to 3. Hence we have
where only are nonzero. Hence, .
2. Following the definition of we see that it is symmetric, i.e. and consequently (the indices on the zero are often skipped for brevity)
3. The result will be a 2nd order object, e.g. . For each entry in , we must sum over the 3 values of . However, if . Only when is . I.e. . Only the term where (i.e. ) will remain. It has the value . Consequently, . In general, when we contract with we can replace either or by or respectively in the factor we multiply with, and remove the factor.
1. As we did earlier for the Kronecker delta, we know that only when (otherwise zero), and hence,
2.
3. following the permutation order, hence